China's Rise Imperils Global Human Rights Project

 

Sameer Arshad Khatlani
Follow on Facebook

Dozens of Rohingya fleeing ethnic cleansing in Myanmar drowned when their boat hit a rock and capsized in heavy seas off the Bangladesh coast in September 2017. Among the dead were children as young as three, who had somehow evaded murderous mobs and the Myanmar military to flee. The visuals of dead babies and their grieving parents cradling, kissing them final goodbyes before lowering them in a mass grave fuelled outrage. The tragedy was the latest in the burgeoning humanitarian crisis that prompted the US to call out Myanmar authorities' actions against the Rohingya. At a UN Security Council (UNSC) meeting, it called them “a brutal, sustained campaign to cleanse the country of an ethnic minority”. But despite an untenable situation, China continued to defend Myanmar amid mounting global pressure on Naypyidaw to end the cleansing.

ALSO READ: How Assad Weathered Storm In Arab Spring Aftermath

China’s Rohingya stand was the latest in its disregard for human rights amid its growing clout through its military might, infrastructure development, and investments globally. It portended the perils of China’s rise and the consequent decline of the US-led post-World War II liberal world order built on the ruins of European empires with self-determination and human rights among its core values. Beijing has not only used its influence to shield itself from accountability over its poor rights record at the UN, which has been one of the institutionalised hallmarks of liberal internationalism. It has leveraged its powerful position as UNSC permanent member to oppose resolutions to address rights abuses in countries such as North Korea and Syria. China has done so along with what is known as Like-Minded Group of countries with dismal human rights records.


China’s ability to get its way was borne out by restrictions imposed ahead of President Xi Jinping’s speech in January 2017 at the UN’s Palais des Nations in Geneva. Parking lots and meeting rooms were closed before Xi’s arrival at the venue. Around 3,000 UN staff were sent home early before the speech from which NGOs were barred from attending. Activist Dolkun Isa, who has been fighting for political rights for the Uyghur minority in China, was earlier in April ejected from the UN headquarters while he was attending an indigenous issues forum.



In a September 2017 report on China’s interference in UN human rights mechanisms, Human Rights Watch (HRW) cited these incidents. It highlighted Chinese officials “have harassed activists, primarily those from China, by photographing and filming them on UN premises in violation of rules and restricting their travel to Geneva.” HRW said that China has used its membership on the Economic and Social Council’s NGO Committee to block NGOs critical of China from getting UN accreditation. China has sought to blacklist accredited activists and to cut funding for UN human rights officers, according to HRW. It is not always that the UN has succumbed to arm-twisting, which would only grow with China’s increasing clout and give free passes to rogue regimes like that of Myanmar, where it has invested heavily.

ALSO READ: Punjabis Dominate Pakistan Army But Only Just

The US has often been found wanting in its advocacy of human rights when they clash with its interests, most notably in Saudi Arabia and Israel. But institutionalised freedoms in the country ensure the media and NGOs like HRW and even state panels like US Commission on International Religious Freedom make up for it. That kind of diversity has no place in China. The run-up to Communist Party Congress in 2017 offered a reminder of how the country works and why it would not care about human rights. Like other high-level meetings, Reuters noted a security crackdown preceded the Congress. It quoted Beijing Daily and reported the city’s largest market for metal building materials had been shuttered. It was being relocated to Hebei province, over 300 km away, along with over 10,000 workers and stall owners.

ALSO READ: West's post-1979 Afghan Misadventure Continues To Cast Long Shadow

Reuters reported the tougher measures targeted migrants “to ensure any petitioners from out of town are rounded up immediately should they attempt to make a scene.” New limits had been placed on discussions in private group chats while tech companies were fined for failing to censor online content and travel for tourists to Tibet was being restricted. Organisers of a discussion on the Middle East cancelled the event fearing possible pressure even as the word democracy was only used once in the adverts. Reuters quoted a source with ties to the censors and reported that the authorities had “considered it risky to screen a film before the Congress, as it is partially set during China’s 1979 war with Vietnam – a touchy subject.” It was feared that the film could “spark debate about the morality and necessity of the conflict.”


Thus, the liberal order howsoever flawed needs to be safeguarded more. Donald Trump's tenure as the US president put it under tremendous strain. He appeared willing to sacrifice it on the altar of his narrow “America First” agenda. His efforts to denigrate and weaken institutions like the UN imperilled the global human rights project.

This is a slightly edited version of a piece published in The Indian Express, the author's former employer, in 2017

Sameer Arshad Khatlani is an author-journalist based in New Delhi. He has been a Senior Assistant Editor with Hindustan Times, India’s second-biggest English newspaper. Khatlani worked in a similar capacity with The Indian Express, India's most influential newspaper known for its investigative journalism, until June 2018. Born and raised in Kashmir, he began his career with the now-defunct Bangalore-based Vijay Times in 2005 as its national affairs correspondent. He joined Times of India, one of the world's largest selling broadsheets, in 2007. Over the next nine years, he was a part of the paper's national and international newsgathering team as an Assistant Editor. 

Khatlani has reported from Iraq and Pakistan and covered elections and national disasters. He received a master’s degree in History from the prestigious Jamia Millia Islamia University in New Delhi. Khatlani is a fellow with Hawaii-based American East-West Center established by the US Congress in 1960 to promote better relations and understanding with Asian, and Pacific countries through cooperative study, research, and dialogue. 

Penguin published Khatlani’s first book The Other Side of the Divide: A Journey into the Heart of Pakistan in February 2020. Eminent academic and King’s college professor, Christophe Jaffrelot, has called the book ‘an erudite historical account... [that] offers a comprehensive portrait of Pakistan, including the role of the army and religion—not only Islam’. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Vijay Shanker Singh: A Personification Of Innate Goodness Of Humans

Heena Grover Menon: A Friend Who Would Not Give Up On Me

Ashish Yechury Could Empathize Like Few Could